Why The iWalk 2.0 Sucks

The iwalk 2.0 gets a lot of praise for being revolutionary, but how functional is it really?

The iwalk 2.0 is a hands free crutch that promotes a different option compared to traditional underarm or forearm crutches.

The idea of the iwalk 2.0 is it’s supposed to operate like a knee scooter except instead of rolling, your walking. In theory this sounds good, but this article will point out a few things wrong with the iwalk 2.0.

First of all, you’ll look like the terminator using this thing. It looks like it can be classified as a bionic attachment. You will definitely be searched showing up at the airport wearing this machine.

People stare at you while you do your best to do your pseudo walk. Your walk will have a clomping, Frankenstein type of vibe to it. At slow speeds you can almost walk properly but trying to do normal activities results in disaster.

The worst part is assembling your leg before you go out. Strap after strap, it’s a hassle. As soon as you get to the last strap, you have to pee.

Another problem with this bionic attachment is you actually need to be strong to use it. There’s no way grandma is going to be able to carry this contraption around on her leg.

If you have a minor sports injury, the iwalk 2.0 might be good for you. Since you are an athlete and your injury is minor, you’ll have the strength and balance to easily use the iwalk. You might even be strong enough not to look like Frankenstein when you walk.

If you are severely injured or old, you’re probably better off looking for a different option. This bionic attachment from the future is still a few years away from perfection. With lightweight materials and an easier to use design, this could be a viable mobility device option in the future. But not right now.